Two independent proposals for a new public-facing Ayuda Hosting website, produced from the same brief under the same conditions. They are presented here for review side by side.
Homepage plus a three-question qualifier that routes to a contact form or a “might not be the best match” outcome.
Homepage plus a qualifying contact page with an intake form and direct contact details.
Two independent proposals for how a hosting customer recovers their website from a previous backup, including where a member of staff has to be involved. Each mirrors pages from both a customer portal and an internal operator portal.
Three-step restore request, a trackable status timeline, and an operator who can approve, ask for more information, or decline.
A backups list with expiry and per-row restore, a structured request, and an operator screen with a change diff, preflight checks and a typed confirmation.
Two proposals for helping a customer whose site stopped working after a change. The brief named no solution, so deciding what the customer actually needs was part of the task. Each spans a customer portal and an internal operator portal.
Two independent answers to the same brief, with a shared landing page and notes on how to walk them.
Two proposals for a customer who wants visitors to reach their new website using a domain they already own, while their existing email keeps working. The brief named no solution and no journeys, so deciding what the customer actually needs was part of the task. Each spans a customer portal and an internal operator portal.
Two independent answers to the same brief, with a shared landing page, both left exactly as their authors made them — including their known defects.
The same customer brief as Experiment 4 — reach the new website on a domain the customer already owns, without breaking their email — but this time each proposal was produced by a team rather than a single agent: a coordinator, two independent investigators, three designers, and one reviewer who took no part in building it. Both teams had the same shape, the same tools and the same budget. Each decided its own answer.
Two independent answers to the same brief, with a shared landing page, both left exactly as their authors made them — including their known defects.